A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:30 on April 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to “I sponse, sponse, sponse, sponse, sponse, sponse, and sponse, sponse, sponse, sponse, and sponse sponse, sponse sponse, sponse sponse, sponse sponse sponse,” sponse one spons, which is dangerous at a garbage separation and removal site adjacent to the apartment site management office, cut off on the inner floor, and broken off the spick spacks, “I spick, spacker, spons, spons,” and spicked three sponss, a dangerous article to eF.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 144 and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, comprehensively taking account of the following factors: (a) the Defendant reflects the criminal act; (b) the Defendant did not have the same criminal history or record after 1995; and (c) the public official’s body was not directly violent; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (b) the sentence as indicated in the record was determined as ordered.