logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.09 2018고단2824
사기방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On May 24, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for aiding and abetting fraud at the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 25, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or take over any access medium unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act in using or managing the access medium;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, according to the orders of the non-scambeder (one name "C"), received d from August 17, 2017 to August 18, 2017 the e-mail card No. 1 (F) connected to the bank account (E) of D from August 17, 2017 to August 18, 2017, and received the e-mail card No. 1 (F) from D, G, H, and I in the name of the holder of the account and e-mail card as shown in the attached crime list of crimes (Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act) and received the e-mail card No. 1 from d, G, H, and I, and received the e-mail card No. 1 from the above person under whose name the e-mail card was obtained from the above person.

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired the access media.

2. The name influencing organization of fraud aiding and abetting the victim to transfer money to the account directed by deceiving the victim by deceiving the employee belonging to the financial institution. The Defendant held a physical card connected to the said account in accordance with the direction of the name influencing (hereinafter “C”) as the name influcing organization (hereinafter “the name influcing organization”) and the victim transferred money to the account directed by the person influcing name by withdrawing the money through the physical card and making the money deposited into the account directed by the person influcing name and received the amount equivalent to one to six percent of the deposit amount.

On August 18, 2017, the name influent person, who is not an employee of a financial institution, is not an employee of a financial institution, nor was he or she thought that he or she would acquire money by deceiving the victim. However, on August 18, 2017, he or she misrepresented the employee of the Smaman Savings Bank by telephone to the victim at an influent place.

arrow