Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 3379]

1. On August 21, 2018, the Defendant interfering with his/her business: (a) demanded a customer at the D restaurant operated by the injured party C in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, to demand the customer to change his/her money and tobacco; and (b) without any reason, the Defendant demanded that the customer be able to look at for about ten (10) years after putting the Chewing sprink, sprink, and sprink.

“The victim’s restaurant operation was obstructed by force over about 20 minutes, by putting the disturbance on the floor of the restaurant, such as putting off the upper and lower part of the sound, and lying the cafeteria on the floor of the restaurant.

2. When the victim and the customers demand to leave a restaurant at the same date and time as paragraph 1, the Defendant damaged the property of the victim by breaking the entrance door of 250,000 won at the market value (150cm wide x 230cm wide x 230cm wide) at the floor of the floor.

[2018 Highest 3557] On July 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 06:00 on the roads front of the Eelhered in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju; (b) creshing a locking place by having the victim F laid off in the vicinity of the said place; (c) 1 Libya, the market price of which is 200,000 won owned by the said victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 3379]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Evidential photographs (2018 Senior 3557);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs taken of damaged materials;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - favorable circumstances: The Defendant recognized his/her mistake, agreed to both the victims, and unfavorable circumstances: The Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on February 2, 2017 and completed the execution of the sentence on May 2018.