A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2018, the Defendant destroyed the above entrance so that the market price cannot be determined by breaking off the entrance door of the above restaurant owned by the victim D on the ground that the victim D did not open the door on the road in front of the restaurant operated by the victim D in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, the Defendant damaged the entrance so that the market price can not be determined by breaking up the entrance of the above restaurant cafeteria.

The Defendant, around 00:40 on December 12, 2018, the 2018 Highest 2437, the Defendant: (a) had been drinking in the E cafeteria operated by the victim D (W, 60 years of age) in Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, and had been driving in the same way as he sprinked, without any particular reason; (b) and (c) on a large scale, “Sspon spon was erroneous;

C. It is necessary to attach all the articles in C.S. and leave this world.

“Along with the desire of “,” etc., the victim’s restaurant business was obstructed by force by avoiding a disturbance of approximately one hour and about 40 minutes, allowing customers to leave his/her place.

On September 5, 2018, the Defendant, around 03:07, on September 5, 2018, 2018, cut off one air-conditioner, which was placed in front of the entrance of the office, in front of the “H” office operated by the victim G in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, one of the air-conditioners, in which the market price on the victim’s ownership is unknown. The summary of the evidence “2018 Highest 97”

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with D "2018 Highest 2437";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Investigative report (to hear statements from victims and report), 2018 Highest 2717 ";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs to cut off on-site CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: