[Defendant A] The sentence for Defendant A shall be suspended.

[Defendant B] Defendant B is punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

Punishment of the crime

At around 11:00 on September 24, 2014, the Defendants: (a) “C apartment 201-dong 3 and 4-dong 201-dong 3 and 4-dong 201-dong 3 and the elevator, etc.” (hereinafter “C apartment 201-dong 1504”) returned the money in question; (b) “F immediately returned the money in question; and (c) “F returned the money in question to C apartment 201-dong 1504, the money in question is converted to the fraud; and (d) “C apartment 201-dong 1504, the money in question is converted to the fraud, and (e) the money is not returned for more than two years from selling and selling, and thus immediately returned the money in question by posting the fourth of this article, thereby impairing the honor of the victims and EF by openly pointing out the fact that it publicly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Defendants of pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts: Articles 307(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (to select each fine, including victims) (in the case of Defendant B, the degree of participation is minor and reflects on the degree of participation, but it does not seem that the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order is excessive in light of the fact that there exists the record of punishment subject to suspension of qualifications or heavier punishment for the past suspension of qualifications

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendant A to be suspended of sentence: Fine of 500,000 won;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A: 100,000 won shall be converted into one day);

1. Defendant A of the suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (in fact, there is a civil or criminal judgment against the victim F, and considering the personal relationship between the victim E and the victim F and his occupation and occupation, the crime against the victim E appears to be reasonable in light of the circumstances, there is no history of criminal punishment for the past month, and there is no history of criminal punishment for the past month, and the defendant does not repeat as a result of the misunderstanding of the error);

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: for reasons above Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.