beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. The defendant of intimidation is a person who was engaged in the business of selling D and Membling, the husband of the victim C (here, 47 years of age), and the victim is a teacher of a high school.
From September 2014, the Defendant began to operate the over-term sales store with D with the trade name, and deposited KRW 10 million into the account of the victim used by the above D as investment money.
The Defendant and D operated an over-the-counter sales store and terminated the partnership relationship on February 2015, and the Defendant did not receive the refund of the investment money for the over-the-counter sales business that was paid earlier, and the Defendant’s pressured the victim to receive the return of the investment money from the victim by finding it as the school where the victim was working.
around 10:00 on August 24, 2015, the Defendant found it as an administrative room of the above high school located in the Si of 10:00, and said, the Defendant stated to the effect that, “C Prestin has changed to its employees.” The victim, who was contacted by the employees, was in a administrative room, was able to dispose of D’s shop due to the Defendant’s albry and rest room, and that, in the rest room, the Defendant would be able to return its investments.”
Around 10:00 on August 25, 2015, the Defendant found the same school as E, and stated to the effect that “I would not return the investment money to F, which was an assistant principal of a school at the time,” and that “I would have been subject to fraud.”
In addition, although the Defendant, who received contact from the above F, said F, called “I am about,” the Defendant stated that “I am back the investment money, which itself was a demonstration.”
The defendant continued to reside in the above school and demanded an interview with the principal of the school, and he must complete an interview with the principal of the school after knowing the absence of the principal of the school with the knowledge of the absence of the principal of the school.