Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 1, 2016, the Defendant would make a telephone call from Makao to the victim B on August 1, 2016, and “the mother would have to pay the money that he/she would need to pay.”

“ ................”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to use money from the damaged party as gambling funds, etc., and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to the existing gambling debts, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money properly.

The defendant acquired 5 million won from the damaged person through the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number C) in the name of the defendant on the same day.

2. On August 5, 2016, the Defendant shall be liable to compensate the victim B for the amount of interest arising from the parents’ damage guarantee at a private teaching institute of the Dong-gu D5-gu, Busan Metropolitan City around 22:00 on August 5, 2016, if he/she lent KRW 25 million to the victim B, he/she shall settle the amount of interest arising from the parents’ damage guarantee, and shall dispose of the shares that he/she has become friendly at the end of August.

“ ................”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to use money from the damaged party as gambling funds, etc., and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to the existing gambling debts, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money properly.

The defendant acquired 25 million won from the damaged party to the foreign exchange bank account (Account Number G) in the name of the defendant's mother F on the same day.

3. On August 12, 2016, the Defendant would pay back to the victim B at the above private teaching institute on August 12, 2016, if the Defendant borrowed money in excess of his/her mother’s debt settlement to the victim B.

“ ................”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use money from the damaged party for gambling money, etc., and the defendant was due to the existing gambling debts.