1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s principal lawsuit against the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) AB, and the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s lawsuit against the defendant A.

[2] As to the lawsuit filed against the owner of AF building, the Defendants, including the Defendant’s association members and some apartment owners, are bound to proceed with the lawsuit as follows. The following additional charges are limited to the Defendant who has yet to complete the registration of the right to the site yet among the Defendants of the case, such as sub-support 2010 Gahap3543 and sub-support 2010 Gahap3550. In other words, according to the direction and purpose of the lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s 1,080 portion of the project plan stated on the home page of the head office shall be returned to the Defendants as the site site. The number of 185 e.g., to be owned by the Plaintiff, becomes the ownership of the Defendants, and thus, the Defendants, who are the owners of the building, are not obliged to remove the building: The Defendant’s preparatory assertion and the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff’s 30% interest derived from the Defendant’s winning of the lawsuit as a result of the cost of filing the lawsuit against the Plaintiff’s winning of the lawsuit; the Plaintiff’s 10%’s interest.