1. The litigation for quasi-examination of the defendant (quasi-examination plaintiff) shall be dismissed;

2. The costs of quasi-examination shall be borne by the defendant (quasi-examination plaintiff).

Based on the facts, the Plaintiff et al. filed a lawsuit claiming compensation for damages with the Daejeon District Court for the reason that the Defendants spread false facts about the Taekwondo ground operated by the Plaintiff et al. and interfere with their publicity activities (2016 Ghana125). However, the said court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff et al.’s claim on November 25, 2016.

Accordingly, the plaintiff et al. appealed.

On January 25, 2017, when the above appellate trial was pending, Defendant B received a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 (hereinafter “instant summary order”) on the ground that the crime was committed against the elementary school students, who reported that Defendant B engaged in public relations activities to recruit a new gymnasium by reporting that the Plaintiff had engaged in the Plaintiff’s activities to attract a new gymnasium, and that Defendant B had damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, such as “wemnas seals and sold seals.”

Accordingly, Defendant B requested formal trial.

1. The defendants suffered a lot of mental pain due to the defendants' improper speech and behavior, and the plaintiffs (referring to the plaintiffs, etc. of this case; hereinafter the same shall apply), so the defendants are seriously dead.

The contents and methods of the apology shall be as shown in attached Table 1.

2. The Defendants shall post an apology on the E Association Association’s bareboat.

The contents and methods of the publication shall be as shown in attached Form 2.

3. The Defendants do not post a banner under the name of the Defendants’ seal or F Association in front of the Plaintiffs.

4. The Defendants did not induce the Plaintiffs to move their seals by obtaining their originals or parents, or did not commit any act that could cause threat to their originals.

5. The Defendants jointly pay KRW 5,000,000 to the Plaintiffs by October 18, 2017.

6. The Plaintiffs withdraw the criminal complaint of defamation cases against Defendant B by the Daejeon District Court 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 192 on the day following the completion of the implementation of the above paragraphs 1, 2, and 5.

(c).