1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit.

1. Basic facts

A. In the past, on March 19, 196, the registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “registration of ownership transfer”) was completed as to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) owned by the Plaintiff on March 19, 1996 on March 12, 1996 under the receipt of the Yangyang District Court Yangyang Registry No. 1522 on March 12, 1996.

B. On July 4, 2014, Defendant B completed the ownership transfer registration under the receipt of the Yangyang District Court Yangyang Registry (hereinafter “instant second ownership transfer registration”) on July 3, 2014, on the grounds of sale as of July 3, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] No dispute between the parties, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment of the parties did not sell the real estate of this case to the defendant B on March 12, 1996, and the plaintiff's mother delivered the plaintiff's seal impression design and certificate of personal seal impression to the defendant B without the plaintiff's consent and completed the registration of transfer of the first ownership of this case, and the prior registration of transfer of the first ownership of this case is null and void. Since the defendant C's transfer of the second ownership of this case, which was acquired the ownership of this case from the defendant B, is also null and void, the defendants asserted that the plaintiff, the owner of this real estate of this case, is obligated to perform the registration procedure of cancellation of the first and second ownership transfer of this case. The defendants asserted that the plaintiff's mother entered into a sales contract on behalf of the plaintiff and completed the first ownership transfer of this case, and both the first and second ownership transfer registration of this case

However, even if a third party is involved in the act of disposal rather than by the direct act of disposal of the former registered titleholder, if the third party is a person in a special relationship between the former registered titleholder and his/her husband, father, etc., the third party is present.