Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Southern District Court on December 28, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 5, 2011, and on May 17, 2012, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, respectively, on May 25, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 25, 2012, and on September 17, 2014, two years of a suspended sentence of eight months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Southern District Court on February 6, 2015, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive and conclusive on February 6, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 13, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: In the real estate licensed real estate agent office of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government where it is difficult to know the trade name in the Eunpyeong-gu Office, and in order to verify the Defendant’s creditor C has a claim for the return of deposit for lease on a deposit basis, the location of real estate: Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s second floor: D2, 100,000,000), 'day’ (Won 100,000,000), 'E’, and 'Lessee’, 'A’ respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a set-off contract in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) delivered the forged pre-sale agreement to the above C as if it was duly formed at the Moel where the trade name in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Guldong cannot be known; (b) as such, the Defendant issued the forged pre-sale agreement to the said C.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a forged private document.

3. Around April 4, 2013, the defrauded made a false statement to the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F commercial building to the effect that “The Defendant would pay off only the two million won, if he/she lends money to the victim G.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed the above money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

The Defendant received KRW 2 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of H.