logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.09.11 2013고단550
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 201, the Defendant had been working as an employee at the “D” office located in Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gyeyang-gu, and had been aware of the personal information of the customers who visited this place, and had been able to open the cell phone through the customer’s mobile phone and use it to acquire it by selling it.

1. Around August 29, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents stated “E” in the “E” column, “F” in the name of the customer and the applicant column, “F” in the resident registration column, and “F” in the “date of preparation” in the form of a new contract for the E-ray service, which is kept at the above “D” office, and entered “E” in the “F” column, the resident registration number column, and the “F,400” in the “F,” and the “F,400” column in the “B,” the unit of the contract for the installment transaction of a device.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new service contract under the name of E, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and one copy of a terminal installment transaction contract.

The Defendant forged a new service contract and a contract for the installment transaction of a terminal via 12 times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes, between the period from that time to September 13, 2012 by the aforementioned method.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), exercised a new service contract in the name of E and a contract for the installment sale of a device in the name of E, as set out in paragraph (1), on the part of an employee in charge of mobile phone opening, who is aware of the forgery.

The Defendant used the aforementioned method from that time to September 13, 2012 a new service contract and a terminal installment transaction contract with a total of 12 times, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

3. The fraud defendant shall pay a mobile phone terminal price even if he/she opens a mobile phone in the name of E in the date, time, and place referred to in paragraph (1).

arrow