logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.28 2017나79495
손해배상(지)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, payments are made in excess of the following part ordering the Plaintiff to pay.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company that is established and operated for the main purpose of online education, work development, and distribution business, etc., and that is, as indicated in the [Attachment List, the instant copyrighted work” (hereinafter “instant copyrighted work”).

2) The Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) provides the Internet website (hereinafter “instant site”) that was established on February 12, 2007 for the main purpose of online information provision business, etc. to enable users to download, peruse, and edit files, and enable other users to download files (hereinafter “instant service”).

3) Defendant B was the sole executive officer of the Defendant Company and directly executed the instant services provided by the Defendant Company. (B) The instant copyrighted works, etc. are video images consisting of English, Japanese, Chinese, French, French, German, German, Spanish, Russian, Russian, Maternia, Maternia, Vietnam, Vietnam, Spanish, Spanish, Synish, Chinese, and Chinese, and other foreign languages, including English, Japanese, Chinese, Chinese, French, French, German, and Chinese, respectively.

2) The Plaintiff entered into a contract with an instructor agreement, which includes a provision that the Plaintiff owns the pertinent video class produced between most instructors, and all the copyrights therefrom. As to the lecture films of an instructor (G, H, I, J, E, K, and L), where the contract is not pending, the Plaintiff is indicated as the publisher of the relevant video class. C. The Plaintiff’s request for protection and the Defendant Company’s measure 1) is the legal entity, the agent.

arrow