logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.02.02 2017고단1194
사기등
Text

In the fourth month of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in the judgment of the defendant, 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or take over any access medium, or lend or take over any access medium in return for payment;

Nevertheless, on January 2017, the Defendant consented to the proposal of a person who was under his name to lend the head of the Tong at his own house located in Daegu-gu and 216 dong 1303, the Defendant sent the head of the Tong, ck card, and password connected to his new bank account in his name to the person who was not under his name.

was issued.

As a result, the defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the approaching media.

2. Fraud;

A. On February 15, 2017, at one’s own house located in Daegu-gu and 216 Do 1303, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, who reported and contacted the above writing, that “I would sell the above mobile phone at KRW 1.70,00,00” to “Neber's Republic of China, China-China, and China-China, a trade site for goods among the Internet.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone to the injured party.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 170,000 won from the damaged party to the Daegu Bank Account under the name of the Defendant’s mother E.

B. On February 18, 2017, at the place of the above paragraph (a) above, the Defendant puts comments on the “Niberian Republic Kafe,” which is the Internet trading site, to sell the “soviet mobile phone in so far as gallon 7 gallons,” and made a false statement on the victim F who reported and contacted the above writing “to sell the said mobile phone at KRW 3.90,00.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone to the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and 390,00 won from the victim's name.

arrow