logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.01.14 2014고단1076
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who has violated the provisions on prohibition of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on at least two occasions by driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on March 21, 2010, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.072% on March 21, 2010, and 0.137% on February 1, 2013.

On August 14, 2014, at around 02:30 on August 14, 2014, the Defendant driven C observer car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.071% without a car driver’s license at a distance of about 10km from around the police box in the Yellow East-si, Sinsi to the front road of the culture and arts center located in the same city.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a C options car.

The defendant seems to have written indictment 0.054% of blood alcohol concentration 0.071% of the indictment without driver's license for cars on the date and time stated in paragraph (1).

A four-lane road in front of the culture and arts center in the transmitting-dong of the city in the Gu-U.S., while under the influence of alcohol, the chamber of commerce and industry proceeds directly along the two-lane of the viewing room of the Gu-U.S...

There are vehicle signal lights and crosswalks on the front door, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely operate the steering staff by checking the signal, checking the right and the right and the right of the driver, accurately operating the steering gear and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, as long as the Defendant neglected to perform his duty at the front time without a driver’s license and neglected to do so, the Defendant found the victim D (the age of 28) drive E, which stopped due to a sudden change of the vehicle signal in red at the front time due to occupational negligence, late behind and failed to avoid this, and led the part behind the right side of the said observern-tur vehicle to the front part before the left side of the observern-tur vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence to the victim.

arrow