logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2012.08.08 2012고정408
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant served as the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives at the fifth apartment in the Guang-si, and was dismissed on August 26, 201, and the victim D is the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives at the fourth apartment, and the victim E is the person who is the representative of the above apartment 103 unit.

On October 8, 2011, at the defendant's house located in the above C Apartment 112 and 2203 around 19:49, the defendant did not enter into a construction contract by the victims more than the normal estimated construction cost in relation to the replacement of play facilities in the front of 110, and there was no receipt of illegal money and valuables from the construction business operator, and there was no receipt of money and valuables from the F Co., Ltd. in relation to the recontract with the apartment management company, with the illegal solicitation from the F Co., Ltd., and for the purpose of slandering the victims even though the expenses of the representative meeting were not embezzled as entertainment by non-entertainment, etc., the defendant's title "G" established on the following website after the Internet portal "I find the amount of public money embezzlement, the illegal construction contract corruption representative, and the Dok room portion" as the representative of the residents' apartment group from June 1, 2011.

However, the former representative again leads to the majority, and the same representative who occupies the majority enters into a contract with residents' knowledge of most of the construction works, contracts, etc. for the last two years, and embezzled the operating expenses of the representative as entertainment expenses, however, despite the absence of clear evidence, the local police station has sent suspicion without suspicion and the prosecution has also dealt with the suspicion of lack of evidence by intentionally omitting judgment.

(A) The following content is the name of the representative of the low-income apartment building, whichever is 5.

It is no longer possible to explain, even though there are many other things.

(A) On May 3, 201, I (hereinafter referred to as "victim E"), the J of directors, and K (referring to "victim E") of the former Chairperson of the Residents' Representatives on May 3, 2011 are the subsidy for replacing play facilities for viewing.

arrow