logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.21 2015가단218157
구상금
Text

1. Defendant A’s KRW 421,570,000 and its weight

(a) From June 6, 2014 for KRW 78,620,00:

(b) 97,600.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a special corporation that is entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with the industrial accident compensation insurance business under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), and Samsung C, D, E, and F (hereinafter “victim”) are the subscribers of industrial accident compensation insurance under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and the subcontractor of Samsung C, D, E, and F (hereinafter “P”) are the workers belonging to the dispute resolution committee.

Defendant A is the owner of G vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), and Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) is the insurer of the foregoing sea vehicle.

B. On November 27, 2013, around 17:50 on November 27, 2013, the occurrence of a traffic accident occurred, where the victims, who completed work at the 2nd place of Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-dong Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-dong sexual traffic, went back to the accommodation provided by the company and getting on the instant vehicle driven by Non-Party H, the employees of the Dong Fee-gu, which was driven by Non-Party H, one lane in front of the Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, the instant vehicle turns off through the snow way, and the instant vehicle is in conflict with the rear part of the cargo vehicle running along two-lanes facing the central separation zone, and at the same time, there was a traffic accident that conflicts with the front part of the cross-city bus running at the same time (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

The driver and the victim of the instant accident were killed in his job due to the severe damage, etc. to the H and the scarcity.

C. The Plaintiff’s payment of industrial accident compensation insurance benefits and the Defendant’s payment of the Defendant’s liability insurance benefits recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid industrial accident compensation insurance benefits to the bereaved families of the victims as indicated below. The Defendant paid liability insurance benefits to the bereaved families of the victims as indicated below in the payment details of the liability insurance.

The details of the payment of the Industrial Accident Compensation Benefits for Restigant B CDD E E on the date of birth are paid on June 5, 2014 on July 8, 2014.

arrow