beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. In around 2012, the Defendant received a contract for the part of the pipeline construction from Samsung C&T Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “T&T”) (hereinafter “T&T”) at the “T&T site,” and upon the request of the lecture officer required for the Samsung C&T, Samsung C&T sales business chain had the Plaintiff deliver the lecture officer to the Plaintiff, the Gangwon-do Enterprise, the Gangwon-do Enterprise (hereinafter “T&T”), which is the Gangwon-do Enterprise, and the A&T company sent the lecture seal taken over from the Plaintiff, and then transferred it to the Defendant via B, the Defendant’s subcontractor.
In other words, the defendant purchased Samsung C&T from the plaintiff and transferred a lecture to a astronomical A&T company for the completion of painting work, and did not raise a lecture at its own expense.
B. Although the defendant did not request, the plaintiff's employee's mistake that the order of Samsung C&T was issued or that the order of Samsung C&T was issued, the plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff transferred the order of Samsung C&T to A&T, not later than the first date of pleading, and the defendant asserted that the plaintiff's claim for damages was groundless since the plaintiff's ownership was in Samsung C&T, and if the purchase and sale of Samsung C&T was established, the plaintiff's ownership was transferred to A&T, and therefore, the plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff's claim for damages was not reasonable, and that there was no clear opinion as to whether Samsung C&T was ordered, and that there was an additional construction between the plaintiff and Samsung C&T. Therefore, the plaintiff's ownership
The plaintiff's assertion is judged on the premise that the contract for the purchase and sale between the plaintiff and Samsung C&T was terminated, and this is judged on the premise that the contract was terminated.
① On April 26, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the lecture 137, and ② on May 24, 2012, the lecture 133, respectively, into the Acheon Company, and the Acheon Company thereafter.