1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff (Appointed) KRW 230,000,000, KRW 2220,000 to the appointed parties C, and KRW 50,000 to the appointed parties D.

1. In fact, the Defendant established H Co., Ltd. around October 2014, and established overseas corporations from around September 2010 to carry out overseas projects, such as FX M&C brokerage, etc., while investing in the said overseas projects, the Defendant has recruited investors by paying agreed profits and returning the investment principal as if the investment principal were returned.

The Plaintiff (Appointed Party, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the remaining designated parties indicated in the list of the Appointeds (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff, etc.”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff, etc.”) invested each amount indicated in the “investment amount” on the date indicated in the “agreement date” as follows by the Plaintiff, etc. to the Defendant, the Defendant would manage the investment amount and pay monthly profits. The Plaintiff, etc. paid the Defendant the investment amount in the “total amount” column below to the Defendant.

(1) Each of the instant investment contracts entered into by the Plaintiff, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant investment contracts”). The term of the investment agreement (original) on the date of the investor agreement was 1,000,000 on December 5, 2015, and the term of the investment agreement was 150,000,000 on March 18, 2016 and 230,000,000,000 on September 70, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “10,000,000 on September 70, 200, 2000 on September 18, 2015) to be 10,000,000 on April 50, 200, 200 on May 10, 2016, 10, 1000, 100, 1005, 1005, 10,000.

(Article 2(3). [Ground of Recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap 1 through 7 evidence (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the facts of the judgment as to the plaintiff's cause of claim, since the term of the investment agreement stipulated in each of the investment agreements of this case has expired, the defendant, except in extenuating circumstances, stated each "investment amount" as stated in each of the above table to the plaintiff, etc.