The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On November 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 23:00 of the facts charged, the Defendant assaulted the victim by making a part of the victim’s entrance one time, booming the part of the victim on the ground that: (b) the victim E, who was in compliance with the charge, went out of the startingr, was flick and talked with the victim; and (c) the victim E, who got out of the startingr.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, after the prosecution of this case, the injured party submitted a written agreement stating that he does not want the punishment of the accused and withdrawn the wishing to punish the accused.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.