logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.05.28 2013고단75
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 15, 2012, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of B Cost Star car, was driving the above vehicle at around 17:30 on the 15th day of December 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and driven the road in front of the treatmenttopopia, which is located in the air-conditioning of Kimhae-si, toward the direction of the snow-topopia.

At the time, the defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes while living well in the front line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent before the end of the Defendant’s vehicle running ahead of the direction of the Defendant’s course at that time, and received the back pentum and panion part of the Defendant’s vehicle with C-owner’s back gate and panion part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, even though the repair cost is damaged to cover approximately KRW 512,761, such as exchange of the back pan-turd vehicle by occupational negligence as above.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) continue to flee after the accident described in the above paragraph 1, the Defendant continued to proceed along the two-lanes between the 17:55 and the 25-lanes from the side of the Gisung Hospital to the 25-lane from the 17:55 day on the same day.

At the time, there was a vehicle waiting for signal at the front door, so the defendant had a duty of care to accurately manipulate the steering direction and brakes while living well in the front door, and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant got off the back part of the GVS car of the victim F(54 years old) driving, which is a corporation E, a stock company, the signal waiting at the front side of the same lane, as that of the Defendant’s vehicle, as the front part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.

arrow