Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 59,674,153 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from August 31, 2010 to February 26, 2016, and the following.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On August 31, 2010, B: (a) around 15:35 on August 31, 2010, B is deemed Cbeer or a car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.142% without a vehicle driver’s license (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
2) The lower part of the Plaintiff’s driver’s 125cc c, which was driven on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle in the front direction while driving the vehicle and driving the two-lane road of the E in front of the city of Gyeongsan and driving the two-lane road, and driving the 125cc c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
[Ground for recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 3, and 6 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)
(2) The grounds of appeal No. 1
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.
C. According to the facts seen earlier prior to the limitation of liability, there is no reason to limit the defendant's liability.
2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.
The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.
In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.
In full view of the purport of the argument as a result of the physical commission on the director of the Katol University at the end of the life expectancy and the director of the Katol University at the end of the life expectancy, the Plaintiff’s life expectancy at 75% of the normal person as of the date of the appraisal as of the date of the appraisal.