logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.16 2014나10495
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the pertinent part of the reasoning of the judgment, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The scope of the Plaintiff’s damage compensation liability is the same as each corresponding item of the attached Table of the calculation of damages in addition to the following separate statements, and the period for the convenience of the calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than the last won shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

In case of lost income: Personal information of KRW 57,706,682 (1): The same shall apply to the entry in the column of "basic matters" in the attached Form of damages calculation sheet.

(2) From September 23, 2019, 30% of the normal person and six years from the appraisal date ( September 24, 2013) to September 23, 2019, the Defendant determined that the appraisal by the first instance court was six years from the date of the award of the Plaintiff’s term of lease. Thus, the first instance court’s determination that the Plaintiff’s normal male life of the same age constitutes the Plaintiff’s life expectancy as of November 26, 2010, which was six years from the date of the instant accident, and November 25, 2016, as of November 26, 2016, which was six years from the date of the instant accident, should be the Plaintiff’s life expectancy. However, in full view of the Plaintiff’s statement of evidence No. 12 and the purport of the entire argument as to the above physical entrustment result, the first instance court’s determination that the Plaintiff’s average male life of the same age constitutes the Plaintiff’s 19 years old term, as of 198 years old term.4.

arrow