1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the occupant of the Seongdong-gu G Apartment-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and Defendant B is the chairman of the election commission in charge of the election management of the instant apartment, and Defendant C, D, E, and H are the members of the said election commission.

B. On November 4, 2011, the Plaintiff run the 10th election for the 322 units and 324 units of the instant apartment complex (hereinafter “instant election”), and was elected as a representative for each Dong by obtaining 36 marks out of 66 marks of the total number of votes.

C. However, on November 5, 201, I, who was candidate in the same election district, filed an objection with the election commission of the instant apartment on the purport that “the act that J made a supporting statement with the Plaintiff as a premises broadcast before the election was affected by the result of the instant election.” The said election commission, after examining the above grounds for objection, decided the invalidation of the instant election on January 17, 201 based on Article 51 of the Management Rules of Apartment Housing and Article 99 of the Public Official Election Act.

On February 2, 2012, the said election commission publicly announced the reelection on the instant election, and on February 16, 2012, upon holding the 10th presidential re-election on the instant apartment units No. 322 and 324 (hereinafter “instant re-election”), I was elected as the representative for each Dong, and the said election commission announced the elected person on February 16, 2012.

E. On October 30, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the said election commission and the council of occupants’ representatives in the instant apartment complex seeking confirmation of invalidity of the decision on the elected winner at the Suwon District Court branch. On October 30, 2012, the said court dismissed the lawsuit against the Plaintiff’s above election commission on the ground that the said election commission has no capacity to be a party, and on the ground that the act of internal broadcasting by the J does not constitute grounds