1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. In addition to the main claim and counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff’s main ground for appeal is not significantly different from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance. However, even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance (written evidence No. 69 through 74) is added to the evidence submitted in this court (written evidence No. 69 through 74), it is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s father purchased from AE a 6,000 square meters of AD AD forest (=5,775 square meters of AD forest AD forest 5,775 square meters after division) prior to division from AE on January 31, 1950, or occupied it in a peaceful and openly and openly owned intent to possess it for twenty (20) years after the above sale, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court to this purport is justifiable.

Accordingly, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is dismissed since it is without merit, and the defendant U's counterclaim of this case is accepted. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and it is dismissed as the plaintiff's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.