A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on May 5, 2012, and is currently in the grace period. On July 4, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced three months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, and this judgment became final and conclusive on October 4, 2012.

(In response to the judgment of the court of first instance that sentenced the defendant three months of imprisonment, the defendant appealed, and was pending in the appellate trial trial, and was released on August 17, 2012 at the Seoul Southern Southern Detention House and thus released. On August 31, 2012, the appeal was filed with the Supreme Court upon the dismissal of the appeal on August 31, 2012, but the said judgment became final and conclusive upon the withdrawal of the appeal on October 4, 2012 / [criminal facts]

1. At around 02:20 on August 17, 2012, the Defendant called “D Public Notice Board,” a resident E, who had been living in the Guro-gu Seoul metropolitan fourth floor, at around three months prior to the Defendant’s residence, called “D Public Notice Board,” the Defendant continued to read “the victim E, who was a resident, was living in front of the Defendant’s entrance, and went back to the Defendant.” That is, there was no reason to see, “I have opened a crypt,” and “I have opened a crypt,” and the Defendant attempted to enter the said 6th door door door door, but the victim did not correct the door and open it, but did not intend to commit an attempted crime.

2. On August 17, 2012, from around 03:10 to 03:30, the Defendant rejected the Defendant’s request from the main point of “G” operated by the victim F of the second floor of the building indicated in paragraph (1) to store the victim’s body, and thereby interfered with the Defendant’s bar business by force, by avoiding disturbance, such as “in accordance with the night, she shall do so,” and “culpium,” and by taking the desire to keep the victim’s body from the main point of the building as stated in paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant, from around 04:00 on August 17, 2012 to around 04:15, at the “I” restaurant operated by the victim H on the first floor of the building as stated in paragraph (1), without any reason, to female employees and female customers, without any reason.