logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.26 2015나2011036
사실확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. A. On September 2003, the Plaintiff appeared to have made an agreement between Defendant 2 and Defendant 4, and Osan City C (hereinafter “instant land”). On the other hand, around May 2004, the said land was divided into H large 154m2 and I large 532m2m2, and again, it appears that the said I land was divided into I large 188m2, J large 172m2, and K large 172m2m2 and its lot number changed. The Plaintiff did not receive any unregistered resale proceeds (hereinafter “agreement on September 203, 201”), and the Plaintiff did not appear to have received any share of KRW 100 million in the instant land as evidence, and the Plaintiff did not appear to have received any share of KRW 200 million in the instant land as a witness, and the Plaintiff did not have received any share of KRW 1300,000,000,000,000 from the Plaintiff.

In addition, although the plaintiff filed a complaint against G, etc. for embezzlement of the land of this case, due to the defendant's testimony in the above related civil procedure and the statement made by the defendant as witness in the above complaint case, the plaintiff's land of this case.

arrow