1. The defendant is classified into the Plaintiff, among the real estate listed in the attached list, the list of the contents of the attached drawings, the scope of the BJ, and the scope of the materials.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 20, 2017, the Plaintiff and the Defendant paid KRW 20,00,000 (in case of a contract, KRW 2,000,000 for intermediate payment, KRW 8,000,000 for intermediate payment, KRW 10,000 for intermediate payment, October 30, 2017, and KRW 10,000 for each payment until February 28, 2018), monthly rent, KRW 1,000,00 for the instant real estate (in addition to value-added tax, and KRW 90,000 for each payment from November 1, 207, and the payment date shall be paid at 30 days after each month, and the lease agreement shall be concluded between October 30, 200, KRW 90,000 for the first 12-month period (value-added tax) and from October 30, 2017 to September 30, 2017).

B. In the instant lease agreement, where a lessee fails to pay rent more than twice, a lessor may terminate the lease agreement, and where a lessee fails to pay the remainder of the lease deposit, the contract is automatically terminated.

C. Although the Defendant used the instant real estate upon delivery around October 30, 2017, the Defendant paid 10,000,000 won the down payment and intermediate payment out of the lease deposit, and did not pay 10,000,000 won until February 28, 2018, and was in arrears two or more times until February 28, 2018.

Accordingly, on March 2, 2018, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his/her intent to terminate the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the remainder of payment and delinquency in rent, and the said notification was the same month.

5. The defendant has reached.

F. From December 18, 2017 to August 7, 2018, the Defendant paid 9,540,000 won [19,00 won 】 8,910,000 won 】 9,910,000 won 】 630,000 won (per 19 days %) to the Plaintiff, and paid 630,000 won to the Plaintiff by August 19, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above finding of the judgment on the request for extradition, the instant lease agreement is due to the Defendant’s failure to pay the remainder of the lease deposit and the delay in rent.