A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 01, 2014, the Defendant reported to the 119 emergency squad on the grounds that the Defendant’s wife C was the head of the Defendant, but was drunk and did not notify the Defendant of the Defendant’s address normally to the 119 emergency squad. Accordingly, the police officers belonging to the 119 emergency squad and the 119 emergency squad were placed in the Defendant’s residence through the mobile phone location tracking by the Defendant’s cell phone tracking, but the Defendant’s wife C did not open the Defendant’s address, once the 119 emergency squad and the police officers came to stand in the Defendant’s residence.

Nevertheless, from 00:27 to 02:32 on the same day, the Defendant reported to 112 on the same day, and reported “the Defendant died of her her flag.” In the end, the police officers affiliated with the above police box were placed in the dwelling of the Defendant again, and without any justifiable reason, the Defendant, without any reason, threatened the police officers affiliated with the above police box, “A flag f.b. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f., f. f. f. f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;