The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. On October 20, 201, when preparing the instant lease agreement on October 20, 201, the Defendant had set the period and date of the first time, but thereafter, it did not change the above part of the contract to be kept by the Defendant under a mutual agreement with C, and thus, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case. In so doing, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of judgment, namely, ① the original lease contract was made to settle the increased portion of the lease deposit without preparing the lease contract. ② In light of the above circumstances, it is difficult to deem that the lease contract was extended for two years in preparing the lease contract of this case, barring any special circumstances such as the increase of the lease deposit or the expiration of the lease term; ③ if there is an agreement between the Defendant and C extending the lease term, C must have the same contents of the lease contract in its custody; ④ C has notified the Defendant of the termination of the lease contract of December 27, 201 after the expiration of two months from the time the lease contract of this case was made, and thereafter filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the delivery of the apartment of this case. On July 25, 2012, C and the Defendant delivered the above apartment by no later than August 20, 2012, and the Defendant did not present his claim regarding the extension of the lease term of this case.