beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows, and thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Plaintiff asserts that in a party-based trial, the part of additional determination is likely to cause damage to the knee room of the Plaintiff’s both sides, and thus, the Plaintiff constitutes “a person who clearly shows the erogrity of the erogrity from the examination of X-ray, etc., regardless of appropriate treatment,” among the types of “persons with disability in light of the erogrity in light of the erogrity of the erogrity” in subparagraph 8(a) of Article 8-3 [Attachment 4] of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on
However, the above Type 3 referred to as "a person who, despite appropriate treatment, has been suffering from occupational disorder in light of the following: (a) a change after credit due to flag damage is obvious in the examination of X-ray; and (b) a person who has a disorder in light of the flagal function due to flaging, etc.; and (c) a person who falls under such Category 3 shall be proved to have been able to be able to be deemed to have suffered from occupational disorder due to flaging, etc. in the examination of X-ray; and (d) a person who has a disorder in light of the degree of flagal activity in the category 1 or 2, and the degree of flaging in the sense
(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2017Du37284, May 30, 2017). According to the statement Nos. 3, 2017Du37284, each statement of Nos. 1 through 6, and each appraisal (Supplement) with respect to the head of the 1st instance Daegu University Hospital, even though it is confirmed that the Plaintiff’s knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne knee kne kne