1. On March 11, 2015, the Defendant filed a claim for revocation of reprimand disposition between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) was a school foundation that establishes and operates the C University, and the Plaintiff was newly appointed as an associate professor of the C University D Department of Law (the name of the said department was changed to the E Department on March 1, 2009; hereinafter referred to as the “E Department”) on March 1, 2007, and is currently serving as an associate professor of the E Department.

On December 28, 2011, the president of the Intervenor requested a resolution of disciplinary action against the Plaintiff to the Teachers' Disciplinary Committee of C University (hereinafter referred to as the "Disciplinary Committee").

On February 18, 2012, the Disciplinary Committee passed a three-month disciplinary measure against the plaintiff on the ground that the plaintiff's misconduct as mentioned above violates Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity), and 64 (Prohibition of Profit-making and Concurrent Office) of the State Public Officials Act, which are applicable mutatis mutandis to Article 55 of the Private School Act, and the intervenor was subject to a three-month disciplinary measure against the plaintiff on the 21st of the same month.

(1) The Plaintiff, at the end of the abuse of rights, received confirmation on the illegal facts such as the use of research funds to F for the purpose of F’s request for disciplinary action. The Plaintiff, at the end of the abuse of rights, was assigned to G professor who was the first and the first senior professor without any criteria in the teaching column of DD department and website. On March 201, 201, the Plaintiff, at the end of the instant disciplinary action, was posted to the first professor, who was the first and the senior professor, was posted to the first professor. On April 201, 201, the Plaintiff did not put part of G professor while leading the large-scale academic conference and leading the department introduction book, and made some of G professor was not assigned to F, which caused the occurrence of the incident, and requested F to change the guidance book of graduate students.

② On June 17, 201, the last day of the term death period, and August 17, 201, the same professor and the defamation Plaintiff discussed students about the use of F’s research funds, lack of class, etc.