1. The defendant details attached to the plaintiff A, B, C, D, F, G, H, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, and the third engineering company.

Basic Facts

1) Project name: S access road construction works (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”).

(2) Public notice of the project implementer: Defendant 3’s public notice: Public notice of the modification of the road zone (T 4) on November 21, 201: The date of expropriation (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”) on October 19, 2012 by the Central Land Tribunal of U.S. public notice of Chungcheongnam-do on October 2, 201: The date of expropriation (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): The subject of expropriation on December 2, 2012): The details in the attached Form “land subject to expropriation and obstacles” column.

(3) Compensation for losses for the land and obstacles subject to expropriation of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "land and obstacles subject to expropriation of this case" : 4) An appraisal corporation: a new appraisal corporation in the future, a stock company, and a Japanese appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as an "appraisal for expropriation") 【No dispute exists in the ground for recognition - the appraisal result - Eul 1, 7, 8, and 12 evidence (including each number number), the plaintiffs' assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, and the plaintiffs' assertion 1). The compensation for the land subject to expropriation and obstacles subject to expropriation of this case under the adjudication of expropriation of this case was not properly reflected in the value decline loss due to the reasons such as selection of reference land, individual calculation factors, selection of compensation example, imbalance between compensation price and neighboring compensation price, etc., the compensation amount calculated in the appraisal of appraiser V of this court as to the entrustment of appraisal of this case and the difference between the compensation amount and the compensation amount calculated in the appraisal of appraisal of the appraiser of this case should be reduced or less than the compensation amount for the plaintiffs's subject to expropriation of this case.

Judgment

1 In the lawsuit on the increase or decrease of compensation for expropriation, there is no illegality in the evaluation methods of both the results of the adjudication and the results of the court appraisal.