1. The defendant shall enter the difference column in the separate sheet of compensation for losses to the plaintiffs, respectively, and the corresponding amount.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Housing site development project: Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs public notice on December 31, 2008 - N on December 31, 2008, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs public notice on April 5, 2012, P public notice by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 24, 2012, Q Q-project operator public notice by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 29, 2013: Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on May 23, 2013 - The subject of expropriation is as indicated in the “land” list of the details of compensation for losses.

- Compensation for losses: as shown in the “(i) interest ruling” column in the separate sheet of compensation for losses.

- Commencement date of expropriation: July 16, 2013

The Central Land Tribunal's ruling on March 20, 2014 - Contents of the ruling: The plaintiffs' claim for increase in compensation for losses was dismissed.

- An appraisal corporation: A certified public appraisal corporation which has been in charge of the dispute resolution and the central appraisal corporation in charge of the dispute resolution (hereinafter the above appraisal corporation shall be referred to as "adjudication appraiser," and the result of appraisal shall be referred to as "adjudication") [based] without dispute, Gap's 1, 2, Eul's 1 (including each number), Eul's 1 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The amount of compensation for losses caused by the plaintiffs' assertion and ruling of acceptance shall be increased since the plaintiffs' wrong selection of comparative standards, or the normal market price is not taken into account, or the compensation for losses caused by individual factors, other factors, etc. are excessively underassessment.

B. In light of the facts acknowledged earlier, the aforementioned evidence and the result of a request for the market price appraisal of the appraiser R by this court, the fact that the adjudication appraiser and the court appraiser have assessed all of the land of this case by comprehensively taking account of the entire purport of the pleadings as a result of the fact inquiry, and the methods and contents of appraisal of the court appraisal, etc., the adjudication appraiser and the court appraiser can recognize the fact that all of the land of this case are assessed by comprehensively taking into account the relevant laws and regulations