All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since the defendant did not assault the victim and filed a false complaint with the victim's assault before the victim was committed, this paper argues that "the victim made a false complaint" posted by the defendant is true, but it is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts that affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court (a fine of KRW 1.5 million) is too unfilled and unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts, the defendant was convicted of the facts charged that "In the case of the defendant's Goyang-gu Seoul Apartment Complex Management Office around October 18, 2009, Goyang-gu Seoul apartment management office around 15:00, the defendant inflicted an injury upon the victim requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment (the case of injury, etc. at the court below's 2010 Man-Ma281), the defendant was sentenced to a conviction (the case of injury, etc. at the court below's 2010 Man-Ma281).

6.5. The fact that the above judgment became final and conclusive, however, the Defendant did not assault the victim as stated in the above facts charged, and therefore, the victim’s complaint is detained by making a false accusation, and the victim’s complaint is contrary to the facts constituting the crime of the above conviction judgment, and the head of the bus stop and the management office in front of the apartment complex between March 24, 2011 and August 7, 2012, attached a copy of the statement submitted by the victim at the time of the investigation of the conviction final and conclusive judgment to the police station and the court with the phrase “if the victim does not want to view it as an advertisement, all of the false accusation and accusation that the victim received as a result of resolution by adding them to the police station and the court.”

In addition, the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, i.e., the above places, where many and unspecified people have frequent access, are posted during the passage.