1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff was in office as the head of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Management Office, and the defendant was a resident of the above apartment and the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives.

B. The Plaintiff demanded the key to the management office replaced by the Defendant in the above apartment management office, and there was a dispute between the Defendant and the Defendant in the process.

C. On December 15, 2014, the Defendant was diagnosed on the need for three weeks’ treatment due to the salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood at the Diplomatic Institute.

On March 9, 2015, the Defendant filed for a formal trial against a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 (Seoul Central District Court 2015Da3232, Seoul Central District Court 2015Da3232), and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 as an injury crime on February 15, 2016, where the Defendant received a summary order (Seoul Central District Court 2015Da3232), and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,00 as an injury crime on February 15, 2016.

(Seoul Central District Court 2015KaMa1169). The defendant appealed, on September 8, 2016, the above court dismissed the defendant's appeal (Seoul Central District Court 2016No871). The defendant appealed, but the Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's appeal on December 15, 2016 and the above judgment became final and conclusive.

hereinafter referred to as "the criminal case of this case"

(ii) [In the absence of a dispute over the basis of recognition, entry in Gap's evidence 1, 2, 3, 6 through 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the occurrence of liability for damages, the defendant is liable for compensating the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiff, since he/she assaulted the plaintiff to inflict an injury.

The defendant asserts that there was no assault against the plaintiff, and that there was no injury as alleged by the plaintiff.

In other words, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of each of the above evidence, Eul evidence, Eul evidence No. 4-1 and Eul evidence No. 2, and the overall purport of arguments, are as follows, the plaintiff in the criminal case court of this case.