logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.08.30 2017고단232
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:00 on November 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had a bridge in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D party room” located in the “D party room,” and (b) had a spathic spathic spath from the victim E (48 years old); (c) had a spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spabbbling, and had a bridge spathic spathic spathic spathic spabbling

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The defendant asserts that the injured person was used as a pool without force on the bridge while the defendant and the injured person were boomed with balp and balp with balp, and that the injury in the facts of crime was caused by the balp of the victim, not by the act of the defendant, or the injury was already caused before the occurrence of this case.

Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, the fact that the defendant flapsed the victim's flabbbbbing the flabbing of the flab that the defendant was flabing on the flab in the Gu room, that the victim who was unable to occur due to the flabing of the 119 first-aid vehicle was sent to the hospital, that the victim was on the flabing bridge in 2016, that the flab was under hospital treatment, but the flab was different from the flabing part of the injury of this case, that the flabing name stated in the flabing medical certificate was recently issued, and that the flabing part

In light of the circumstances at the time of the crime of this case, the background and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the injury in the crime of this case was caused by the Defendant’s act of injury, not by the victim’s king (in a case where the victim’s spaths have contributed to the occurrence of the result of the formation of a specific injury or the prolongedization of the treatment period due to the aggravation of the victim’s spaths together with the act of injury, the injury of this case is recognized as the relation

arrow