logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.09.18 2018고정152
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 23:00 on September 29, 2017, at D'D located in Pyeongtaek-si, Defendant B, who was a punishment, was found out of and out of the prison, while he was satized with victim E (50 tax) and satis. While the victim following the satis and the satis were satising each other, the victim's face and part of the satisf and the satis were satisfed.

As a result, Defendant A suffered injury to the victim on the face of an inner part that requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol of suspect interrogation of E (including a medical certificate);

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The facts charged against Defendant B (including the facts charged against Defendant A’s joint injury) found Defendant B, who was satisfing with the victim E (50 years of age) at around 23:00 on September 29, 2017, and was satisfed with the victim E (50 years of age) at around 23:0 on September 29, 2017. While the victim followed and satisfed each other, Defendant B was satisfed with the victim’s face at one time, and Defendant A was satisfed with the victim’s face and part of the part of the victim’s face by drinking and satisf.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the part of the victim in need of treatment for about 14 days.

2. The Defendant B’s joint injury as stated in the facts charged of the judgment is that Defendant B took one time at hand the face of Defendant B.

However, according to CCTV images, only Defendant B seems to have pushed off E, and E also the damaged person stated in this court that Defendant B only pushed off himself.

In the end, there is no sufficient evidence to recognize that Defendant B had inflicted an injury jointly with Defendant A by taking the face of Defendant B one time by hand.

The victim E shall be the defendant A in the court of law.

arrow