1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On October 2, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) leased KRW 10,00,000, KRW 1,000 per month of rent, KRW 1,00,000, and around that time, the Plaintiff: (b) installed 3x 6 container 4 units on the above land; (c) purchased 3x 9 container 2 units from E; and (d) subsequently, the Plaintiff could no longer operate the business any longer at the beginning of 2015; (c) the Plaintiff, who was returned the deposit from Defendant B, moved 3x 6 container 4 units to another place.

Defendant B, without authority, obtained profits from the lease of three containers remaining on the above land to Defendant C without authority (3 x 6 x 3 x 9 2 containers), and Defendant C refused to demand the return of the Plaintiff while taking advantage of and making profits from the above containers. The Defendants jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages equivalent to 31,000 won per three containers (3x 6 x 6 00,000 won per one container x 9 x 2 25,000,000 won per two containers x 9 x 2 containers) and the collection equipment owned by the Plaintiff located inside the above containers (2 computers, two monitors, two air conditioners, two air conditioners, two air conditioners, nine air conditioners, four saws, two 2 bring, two bring, two 2 bring, two bring, two 2 bring, three 20,40,400 won per two 20,4720,7420.

2. The reasoning of the judgment reveals that only the 3x 6 standard container 1 cost existing on the land in Gwangju City is installed by the Plaintiff, and 3x 9 standard container 2 cost on the land in Gwangju City is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff was purchased from the person with the authority of the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to support this. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit without further examination.

For the plaintiff, the above containers and internal office fixtures are applied to the plaintiff.