The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant, at around 12:16 on September 17, 2016 and around 12:24 on around 12:24, the charge, connected to the victim C (V, 32 years of age) to the Kakaototostosto andtostos to the victim C, and does not interfere with “C’s remaining money so.”

쇠도요

“C-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-

“Publicly insulting the complainant by posting the word “”.

2. The offense of insult as referred to in the crime of insult refers to the expression of an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that could undermine a person’s social evaluation without mentioning the facts (see Supreme Court Decision 2008Do8917, Dec. 11, 2008, etc.). The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed as the expression of the facts charged in this case’s case’s “an expression of an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that could undermine a person’s social evaluation without indicating the facts,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting a crime, the court below rendered a judgment of innocence in accordance with the proviso of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and decided not to declare the purport of the public notice of acquittal pursuant to the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.