logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.11.17 2016고정877
폭행
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Defendant B is a person who lives in A's house.

Defendant

B around 21:30 on May 30, 2016, around 21:21:30, the victim A, before the Socheon-gu Incheon District Court, used a provisional attachment in his/her own residence through the support of the Incheon District Court, assaulted the victim by spiting spits or using the victim's face once in the face of the victim.

As a result, the defendant was suffering from a 30-day framework for the victim's 30-day therapy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. A’s legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the defendant B and A;

1. A report on investigation (the sequence 1 of evidence list);

1. A medical certificate of injury and a certificate of issuance of a copy of medical record [the victim consistently stated by the investigative agency that Defendant B had been faced with the face at one time until this court reaches this court, and thus, the victim’s witness to the crime of this case also stated that he was at the time when Defendant B took the face of the victim at one time, and corresponding to part of the victim’s statement. The victim was found guilty of the charge of this case in view of the following facts: (a) the victim was sent back to the 119 Escort immediately after the instant case; (b) the victim was diagnosed by taking CT photographing at the emergency room of the Ycheon-ro University of the 119 Macheon National University; (c) returned home on June 7, 2016 after the victim’s factory work; and (d) the victim was re-hospitalized to the above hospital to undergo a non-alley surgery; and (e) it is difficult to find any other reason why the victim might suffer injuries other than the assault of this case.]

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part concerning the rejection of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A);

1. Defendant A, at around 21:30 on May 30, 2016, is the victim B prior to Seocheon-gu E.

arrow