Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 29, 2016, at around 16:25, the Defendant, on the front of the bus stops of 194, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 194, when receiving a report from the head of the police box B of the Daegu-gu Police Station B, who was called for, and received a notification from the head of the police box B of the Daegu-gu Police Station B, about personal information, tried to go back to his own vehicular road and tried to go back to his own vehicular road. The Defendant was subject to the control from the head of the police station C for 20 years.
As one of the handss, the lower court used the chest of the instant C, which used the buckbucks, and assaulted several times for distribution, bucks, and static.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C
1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentence], taking into account the following circumstances, such as the age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., as indicated in the records of this case, the sentence is determined as per the disposition.
D. Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant's use of violence against a police officer who is performing legitimate official duties, and his/her liability for such crime is not against the law.
The defendant shows a attitude that reflects his mistake.
The defendant has no record of the same crime.