A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From June 16, 2018 to June 14:25, 2018, the Defendant: “E located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, the victim of which is the victim C; and, without any reason, “E” in this case, the victim’s bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, which

In the case of the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as "the Republic of Korea") returned money again to the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as "the Republic of Korea") led the victim to his/her restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes, such as taking the victim's actions, and taking the victim's actions.

2. At the date, time, and place specified in Paragraph 1 above obstructing the performance of official duties, Defendant 1 continued to take a bath to the victim, who was the owner of the work, even though he asked questions about whether the Ha and the Ha were to pay the liquor value to the Defendant and the reason why the disturbance was avoided, etc.

Accordingly, the police officers were able to perform their legitimate duties on the 112 report of police officers by assaulting the police officers, such as “I am flick, I am for the police,” “I am flick,” “I am for the very large interest,” “I am for drinking,” “I am for the chest of the police,” “I am for drinking,” “I am for the chest of the police,” and “I am for the arms of the police.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on community service and lecture attendance order;

1. Group 1 (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) of the scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing guidelines (the scope of the recommended punishment) is the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who is subject to special sentencing).