The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who uses 'D' from SNS 'SNS'.

피고인은 2017. 9. 20. 01:00 경 하남시 E 아파트 706동 2002호의 피고인의 주거지에서 스마트 폰을 이용하여 피고인의 인스타 그램에 접속한 후 인터넷 가방 판매 사이트인 ‘F ’에서 판매하는 가방사진을 캡처하여 피고인의 인스타 그램에 업 로드하면서 “ 가방은 G 이 로고 삭제 후 땡 처리하려고 만든 가방 이에요, 판매하시는 분, 모조품 판매하는 거라

The court is hot to communicate with the court.

“A notice posted a false statement.”

However, the facts are that there was no production or distribution of the above bags in G operated by the victim H, and the defendant did not have any confirmation as to the production or distribution of the above bags in G. At the time of the instant case, the defendant and the victim were in the state of legal disputes, such as the disposition of prohibition of the manufacture or sale of maternity products, and the lawsuit of invalidation of the registration of design, and there was a court decision that the damaged person constituted an infringement of the design right to the registered design of the defendant in the said lawsuit. Accordingly, the defendant again infringed the defendant's design right.

I thought that the honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts with the aim of slandering the victim.

2. Determination and conclusion

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 70 (3) of the above Act;

C. On May 28, 2018, after the prosecution of the instant case, the “written application for non-prosecution of punishment” stating the purport that “the injured person does not want punishment of the Defendant” was submitted to this court.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;