A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On August 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on August 13, 2013 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 21, 2013.

1. Crimes against victims C;

A. On June 1, 2011, the Defendant: (a) obtained a copy of the resident registration certificate, personal seal impression, and resident registration certificate from the E Animal Hospital located D at the time of permanent stay at D; and (b) intended to have C registered it as a joint guarantor and deliver the new car; (c) around June 3, 201, the Hyundai Capital Officer, who is aware of such fact, made his/her name in the G, the “F” in the name column of the joint guarantor, the “B” in the resident registration number column, the “B” in the relationship column of the applicant, and the “B” in the “P,” the “H, mobile phone column,” the “E animal hospital” in the workplace address, the “E animal hospital” in the “EM”, and the “EM Hospital” in the “EM” column, the “EM Hospital” in the name of the joint guarantor, and the “190,000,000” in the “joint and several surety name” column.

As a result, the Defendant forged a new set of application form in the name of C, which is a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. Around June 3, 2011, the Defendant exercised the right to file a forged new discount application with the staff-in-charge who is aware of the forgery at the former and American Branch Co., Ltd. at the time of the Gu-U.S. (U.S.) as if the document was duly formed.

C. On June 1, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around early early 201, at the Kenek’s business office located under the jurisdiction of the Si/Gu, said that “The Defendant is obliged to pay the victim C the amount of KRW 444,400 of the self-paid premium for the passenger car in a long-term rental agreement of June 1, 201.”

However, in fact, in the case of Krenk long-term rental rental car, it was a vehicle that did not pay its own premium.

The Defendant is the victim.