logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.12.23 2015고단600
산업안전보건법위반등
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.

Reasons

Defendant A is the Minister of Boli-si, the Boli-si, who will perform the entrusted operation service business of F in Boli-si, Boli-si, the K-si, the K-si.

Defendant

The "BAR" is a business owner who is established for the purpose of the power generation facility operation and maintenance business in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Defendant

A The defendant is a person who is responsible for safety management for his/her employees as the director of the above B-B dispute mediation plan.

On November 18, 2014, the Defendant confirmed whether the victim H(31 years of age) was in operation of the tamping water equipment on the third floor of the FF 7, 8, and the third floor of the CF 2014, and thus, the Defendant, who is a safety manager, has a duty of care to take necessary measures, such as immediately suspending the operation of a consortium, etc., in cases where the worker is likely to be in danger because the worker's body part of the worker's body is cut over or congested, etc., the Defendant, who is a safety manager, has a duty of care, such as construction of a personal bridge for the safety of workers.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not perform his duty of care, such as failing to install an emergency stop device and a personal bridge in the vicinity of tiny water supply equipment B.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of business, caused the victim to die due to the diversities of heading, and did not take measures necessary to prevent industrial accidents at the same time to prevent industrial accidents. The Defendant’s failure to take measures to prevent industrial accidents, such as causing the victim’s divers damage caused by the diversation of heading, bones, etc., in order to verify the cause of the diversation of the diversing water equipment, which was cut off to the upper slurg supply slurgs with no personal bridge.

B. B The Defendant, at around November 18, 2014, entered in paragraph 1, F7, around 21:20.

arrow