beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. On July 5, 201, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care with the Defendant with respect to the injury or disease that occurred on July 5, 2011 (hereinafter “the injury or disease in this case”), namely, the scambling of the abnormal part where the injury or disease was caused, namely, (i) the scambling of the abnormal part where the injury or disease was known, (ii) the escape symptoms of the conical signboards, (iii) the scambing bed, and (iv) the scaming bed, and (iv) the scambling bed, and (v) the Defendant applied for medical care with respect to “the scambling bed and the right bed,” and (iv) the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of non-approval for the remaining injury or disease.
The court of first instance rendered a judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim, and the plaintiff filed an appeal only with respect to the part of "proporizontal escape certificate of light signboards" in Articles 3-4, 5-6, and 6-7, and the part of "proporizontal escape certificate of light signboards" which the court of first instance lost in the court of first instance shall be deemed to have become separate and final, and the part of "proplate" in the disposition of this case shall be limited to the part of seeking the revocation of non-approval regarding "proporizontal escape certificate of light signboards" in Articles 3-4, 5-6, and 6-7.
2. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion of the trial
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff is engaged in an excessive delivery service, such as filling and delivering heavy weight of a narrow alley and stairs in the middle. In particular, there were many cases where a postal item accumulated in a height in the course of loading and moving postal items or delivering postal items to the otoba, and where the said postal item is stored in a wooden part or back head, the Plaintiff’s act of business promotion of the escape of the obbag, and ultimately, the causal relationship between the escape certificate of the obagba in the instant case and the performance of official duties should be acknowledged.
B. The symptoms of the judgment are caused by an accident during the performance of duties, in light of the circumstances of the accident, etc.