Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who has joined the Internet sharing site file reading (htp:/www.Filedo.com) as "E" written in the B indictment appears to be a clerical error (as stated in the investigation record No. 54).
No author's property right or other property rights protected pursuant to the Copyright Act shall be infringed by means of reproduction, performance, public transmission, exhibition, distribution, lending, or preparation of a derivative work.
Nevertheless, around October 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened the literary work “D” in which the victim C has copyright at his own house without the victim’s permission; (b) opened the work without the victim’s permission; and (c) made many and unspecified persons having access to the said site share it through distribution and transmission; and (d) infringed the victim’s author’s property right.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the written complaint, written statement, materials evidencing copyright holders, and documentary evidence;
1. Article 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act and Article 136 (1) 1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;
1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);
1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant is divided into his/her misconduct and has no record of punishment for a crime; Article 59(1) of