logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.05 2017누83043
양도소득세부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasons for this judgment of this court is that "Article 97 (1) 1 (a) of the Income Tax Act, Article 163 (9) of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act" is "Article 97 (1) 1 (a) of the former Income Tax Act (amended by Act No. 15225, Dec. 19, 2017); Article 163 (9) of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act / [Article 60 (1) of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act) / [the main sentence of Article 60 (1) of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (amended by Act No. 1438, Dec. 20, 2016); Article 60 (1) of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (amended by Act No. 14388, Dec. 20, 201); Article 163 (9) of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act / [the main sentence of Article 80 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act]

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as there is no ground.

arrow