A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) tried to impose a penalty on the Defendant in violation of Article 10 (Crossing of Road Traffic Act while carrying out patrols at the front four-lane road in front of B/L at a luminous address; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties by threatening the police officer, such as assaulting him/her at one time on the face of the front door of the F patrol, which was stopped; and (c) threatening E, such as the said slope D, in the situation where he/she belongs to the same district unit as the said slope D, “hing the view, hinging him/her well, and threatening him/her; and (d) hing him/her the back of the F patrol, which was stopped, with the rear door of the F patrol, and hing him/her facing the front door of the F patrol who was on the front door of the B/L, thereby interfering with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to listen to victim slope D statements);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the following conditions of sentencing are considered in light of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, and the sentence is determined as ordered.

· Unfavorable circumstances: The degree of assault and intimidation is not somewhat weak, the circumstances that have many criminal records of violence and are favorable: The confession of the crime, and the absence of criminal records exceeding fines.